Discussion Paper
A governed framework for AI in Asset-Liability Management
Download the Discussion Paper for the architecture, governance model, and complete geopolitical case study. ↓
Integrating large language models (LLMs) as an analytical co-pilot for financial risk
When the ALM engine finishes a stress run, the hard work is no longer calculation; it is interpretation, challenge, and ALCO-ready narrative. This technical Discussion Paper sets out a governed framework for using Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Large Language Models (LLMs) as analytical copilots in that layer, without replacing the deterministic contract engine.
Dr. Ioannis Akkizidis (Regnology) and Michail Michoulas (Agora Financial) present a practical approach to embedding AI into the Asset-Liability Management (ALM) workflow, from architecture and inputs through a full geopolitical stress-testing case study. The framework assumes AI sits on top of consistent ALM analytics - results for income, value, liquidity, and credit derived from a single analytical cash-flow engine.
What you’ll learn:
From insight to action, across all risk - one integrated platform for every user, enabling proactive decisions from analyst to CRO.
Comprehensive Balance Sheet risk control, from interest rate to liquidity.
Integrated credit risk management, from banking to trading books.
Insight
Learn how a global bank transformed ICAAP and ECL reporting into a risk intelligence framework with Regnology Risk Hub and Regnology Finance Hub, cutting simulation batches from up to 10 days to under 14 hours.
Read moreInsight
As regulatory pressures grow, risk, finance, and reporting must evolve from fragmented data silos to an intelligent, integrated value chain. Our new whitepaper with Chartis outlines the path to building a more efficient & resilient regulatory operating model.
Read moreInsight
The Agentic Gap is Regnology’s AI readiness snapshot of regulatory reporting in 2026. Based on feedback from 276 practitioners across 22 countries, with a large majority inside financial institutions, it reveals that regulatory reporting has reached a tipping point: while 71% of organizations are either exploring or piloting AI, only 16% describe AI as embedded in operations. Scale buys experimentation, not adoption. The gap that matters lies between piloting a use case and trusting AI in the reporting cycle, and not by the size of the institution.
Read more