Solution
Regnology Reporting Hub
A comprehensive, cloud-native regulatory reporting hub designed to streamline the entire reporting lifecycle – from data ingestion to reporting submission.
Read moreThe path to an ILC Charter: Understanding the full scope of its regulatory demands
The Industrial Loan Company (ILC) charter dates back to the late 1950s, when the FDIC began insuring ILC deposits. Over the years, competitive fears and changing Administrations have caused the charter's use to wax and wane. The current Administration is focused on deregulation, innovation, and open-market opportunity. This outlook has sparked renewed interest in these banking charters.
An ILC is a state financial institution that may be chartered in one of seven States – Utah, Nevada, California, Colorado, Minnesota, Hawaii, and Indiana. Utah hosts the majority of active charters. The States require the ILCs' deposits to be insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). As a result, the FDIC has federal supervisory oversight.
Information regarding ILCs under Title 12 of the United States Code (USC) can be found within the provisions governing the FDIC and the Bank Holding Company Act (BHCA).
With the change in Administration, the FDIC was tasked with reviewing the ILC regulations. As a result, in 2025, the FDIC withdrew the previous Administration’s 2024 proposal, which would have imposed stricter regulations on ILCs and their parents. Later in 2025, the FDIC posted a Request for Information (RFI) on ILCs and their parent companies. The FDIC is soliciting comments on its approach to evaluating the statutory factors applicable to certain ILC filings.
In the last 12 months, a number of applications and conditional approvals have been issued, with a concentration in the automotive and fintech industries. Applications have been filed by: Stellantis, Nissan, OneMain, Affirm, and PayPal. Three conditional approvals have also been given: Ford Credit, GM Financial, and Edward Jones. More approvals are expected soon. The recent approvals demonstrate a shift from policy to practice, signaling that the path is open for companies that meet the FDIC’s safety and soundness standards.
An ILC charter allows non-financial firms and fintechs to own a bank, accept insured deposits, and access the federal payments system without being classified as a bank holding company. The key benefits include:
There are risks and disadvantages to an ILC charter; they stem from regulatory scrutiny and the potential for reputational damage. The primary challenges include:
A successful ILC strategy requires a technology infrastructure that can meet federal banking standards from day one. Regnology’s solutions are designed to address these specific compliance and operational challenges.
By implementing a robust compliance framework from the start, your organization can confidently pursue the strategic benefits of an ILC charter while effectively managing its risks.
Solution
A comprehensive, cloud-native regulatory reporting hub designed to streamline the entire reporting lifecycle – from data ingestion to reporting submission.
Read moreSolution
Modern finance management unified by data quality, automation and transparency.
Read more